Letter to the Editor

I was eating my breakfast and came across this Letter to the Editor at the S.F. Chronicle (June 10, 2008):

Don’t call it marriage

Editor – In choosing to impose the dogma of a "vocal minority" upon churches, the California Supreme Court has declared the separation of church and state dead.

The institution of "marriage" between a husband and wife of opposite sexes has its origin in the book of Genesis, predating both the California and United States constitutions by over four millennia. The fact that "the state" codified the biblical term "marriage" into government legislation does not ordain four state operatives clad in black robes to redefine this intellectual property of "the church."

"The state" may concoct any form of civil union it desires and brand it with some politically correct moniker. Just don’t violate the separation of church and state by calling it "marriage."

BOB NYSTROM

Mountain View

So I finished my breakfast and just sent in this letter:

Dear Editor,

Why should citizens in the State of California be subjected to the religious beliefs of others (Bob Nystrom, “Don’t Call It Marriage” June 10, 2008)? Just because Bob Nystrom believes that the world was created four thousand years ago and that the ‘church’ owns the word marriage, does that mean the rest of us should be forced to live under those beliefs? Should the state just become a theocracy? If so, which form of Christianity should be the rule of law? Or maybe it should be Buddhist or Hindu or Jewish or Muslim? Should all religious beliefs be followed and put into the State Constitution? If so, then I propose that the first law to be in the Constitution should be to make divorce illegal except for infidelity (according to the words of Jesus). Believe what you want, just don’t force it on the rest of us. And according to the latest poll, the view of the vocal minority has now become the view of the majority…

Dr. Kevin Kaatz

 

We’ll see if they print it…

My original letter had included the fact that the word ‘marriage’ comes from the Latin word ‘marito’ and that word is not the ‘intellectual property of the church’ at all.  It belonged to the Romans and like a lot of other things, it was taken over by the Christians.  Maybe the Christians who are against gay marriage should go back to their Old Testament and redefine their own modern marriages to mimic those of the Old Testament where wives and children were property and where the women had no say in things.  But I imagine that wouldn’t go over very well today…

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Letter to the Editor

  1. Robert says:

    I would argue when Churches and religious thought or morals are over riding our Judicial System and laws, not only is the Seperation of Church and State dead, but so is Democrarcy.

  2. Kevin says:

    Hey Rob,
    Good point.  It isn\’t really the religious thing that bothers me since a lot of religion does good things.  It is when people start using it to harm other people.  I was just thinking about Jerry Falwell and the fact that he hated the mixing of black and white people because he (and lots of other people) said it was in the Bible.  Well, look what happened.  It became a problem to say that and he miraculously believed something else.  The same thing will happen to those like Mark and Stacy (although I doubt those two will ever come around) in 20 years time.  I hope I\’m around to document it! 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s