I saw a Youtube clip of Obama mentioning his ‘Muslim faith’ at Stacy Harp’s blog. She wants her readers to ‘discern’ whether that was a Freudian slip or not. However, Stacy Harp only shows a very small clip of the entire interview. Here is the interview, if you want to discern what is really going on here.
Here is an example from Stacy’s own blog (Sept. 2):
Stacy Harp Admits that Obama is God!
"The god Obama…"
If you didn’t look at the rest of what Stacy had written, and if you believed what you read, you would think that Stacy now prays to Obama as her god. But that sound byte is a lie.
Or how about another one (from the same Sept. 2 entry):
Stacy Harp Kills Babies!
"we kill babies"
Stacy Harp Admits That She and her Friends are Evil!
"we are showing exactly how wicked and perverse we are."
This is what happens if you only look at the tiny bit that is provided. The reason this was done was to smear Obama. I would bet that many people who don’t like Obama will use this little sound byte against him. But really what they should be doing is discerning the fact that they were only shown a small clip and the person who made it is using this to smear Obama again.
And let’s just say for the sake of imagination that Obama was a Muslim. Big deal! I thought that religious belief was a choice that people make and that this choice is protected…